Reformed Dogmatika

Pieter Saenredam's 1648 painting of the interior of St. Bavo's Church in Haarlem, showing the ordered architecture of a Dutch Reformed worship space.

When Did the Church Begin?

Ask a room of Christians when the church began and Pentecost will usually win the vote. Acts 2 looks like a beginning: the Spirit falls, Peter preaches, three thousand are baptized, and a visible congregation takes shape. The answer feels obvious. It isn’t quite complete.

Dispensationalists have real texts on their side. Jesus promised, “I will build my church” (Matthew 16:18). The baptism of the Holy Spirit was still future before his ascension (Acts 1:5), and Paul teaches that believers are baptized by one Spirit into one body (1 Corinthians 12:13). The case deserves more than a dismissive answer.1

Reformed theology agrees that Pentecost brought something new. It denies that Acts 2 created a second redeemed people unrelated to the saints who lived before Christ. God has one covenant of grace, one Mediator, and one people saved through faith in him. The church existed before Pentecost; at Pentecost it entered its universal New Covenant form.


One Church from the Beginning

The Reformed confessions speak plainly. Westminster Confession of Faith 25.1 defines the invisible catholic, or universal, church as “the whole number of the elect, that have been, are, or shall be gathered into one, under Christ the Head thereof.” This church includes Abel, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, the prophets, New Testament believers, and every saint yet to be gathered.

Belgic Confession Article 27 makes the historical claim explicit:

This church has existed from the beginning of the world and will last until the end. This is evident from the fact that Christ is an eternal King who cannot be without subjects.

Belgic Confession Article 27

The redeemed people of God did not begin with Abraham or Moses. The church appeared after the fall when God promised that the woman’s offspring would crush the serpent’s head (Genesis 3:15). That first gospel promise set the course for the rest of Scripture: God would preserve a people and save them through the promised offspring.

Abraham later received a decisive administration of that promise. God pledged to be God to Abraham and his offspring and to bless all nations through him (Genesis 12:1-3; 17:7). Paul calls this “the gospel beforehand” and identifies all who belong to Christ as Abraham’s offspring and heirs of the promise (Galatians 3:8, 29). Abraham didn’t originate the church, but his household became the covenant community from which Israel would arise.

Under Moses, Israel became an organized assembly. God redeemed the people, gathered them before himself, spoke his Word, appointed ministers, gave covenant signs, and dwelt in their midst.2

Stephen even calls Israel “the congregation in the wilderness” (Acts 7:38). The Greek word is ekklesia, the term ordinarily translated “church” in the New Testament.3

Israel was not identical to the New Covenant church in every respect. Its national and ceremonial form, filled with types and shadows, was temporary. Yet the difference in form did not create a different way of salvation. Old Testament believers trusted the promised Christ and received his benefits through the Spirit. Westminster Confession of Faith 7.6 therefore concludes, “There are not then two covenants of grace, differing in substance, but one and the same, under various dispensations.”


Christ Unites the Story

Christ holds the story together. Paul identifies him as Abraham’s promised offspring (Galatians 3:16). The promises belong first to Christ and then to everyone united to him. Jews and Gentiles do not inherit on parallel tracks; both receive the inheritance in the Messiah.

Romans 11 pictures one cultivated olive tree. Some natural branches are broken off because of unbelief, while wild Gentile branches are grafted in among the remaining branches. Paul does not describe God uprooting Israel’s tree and planting a separate church tree beside it. The nations share the nourishing root of the patriarchal promises, and Gentile believers are forbidden to boast over the natural branches.

Ephesians 2 makes the same point. Gentiles were once alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise. Through Christ’s blood they have been brought near. Christ creates Jews and Gentiles as “one new man,” but Paul also calls the Gentiles “fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God” (Ephesians 2:15, 19). Newness and continuity stand together.

Herman Bavinck summarized this relationship well:

The two are one in origin and content. God, or the Logos, is the author of both, and in both we are presented one faith, one covenant, one way of salvation.4

Herman BavinckReformed Dogmatics, Volume 3

The Testaments differ in form and fullness; the Savior and the way of salvation do not. This same covenant unity governs the biblical argument in The True Israel of God.


What Began at Pentecost?

If the church already existed, what began in Acts 2? Pentecost opened the church’s final earthly form before Christ’s return.

The crucified and risen Christ had ascended to the Father and received all authority. He poured out the promised Spirit as the lasting gift of the last days. The apostles became the authoritative witnesses to his resurrection, Jew and Gentile were gathered on equal terms, and the worldwide mission moved from promise to fulfillment.

Pentecost also moved the church from the shadows of the Mosaic order into the plain proclamation of Christ crucified and risen. Baptism and the Lord’s Supper identify and nourish the covenant community, ordained officers shepherd local congregations, and the completed apostolic witness governs the church. The church now enjoys the clarity, liberty, and worldwide reach promised by the prophets.

This was more than a minor change in church order. The Spirit had given life to believers, made them holy, and equipped them before Pentecost. David could pray, “Take not your Holy Spirit from me” (Psalm 51:11), and Peter says that the Spirit of Christ was in the prophets (1 Peter 1:11). Yet the glorified Messiah had not poured out the Spirit with the same last-days fullness.

First Corinthians 12:13 teaches that believers are baptized by one Spirit into one body. That baptism gathers believers into the church as it now exists under the New Covenant. It doesn’t prove that Abel, Abraham, or David stood outside Christ’s redeemed people. The whole number of the elect belongs to Christ’s universal body, while Pentecost gathered that body into its present visible and missionary form.

Jesus’ promise, “I will build my church,” fits this pattern. The future tense points toward his work as Messiah, not necessarily the creation of a community with no prior existence. The prophets repeatedly promised that God would restore, cleanse, and enlarge a people who already belonged to him. Christ gathered the faithful remnant around himself, accomplished redemption, and established his congregation in its final form.


The Best Dispensational Objection

Dispensationalists rightly insist that the church depends upon Christ’s completed work, resurrection, ascension, and gift of the Spirit. They also rightly resist the idea that God abandons his promises or that Gentile believers may boast over Jews. A fair Reformed response should acknowledge those concerns.

The question is whether those truths prove too much. Does the newness of Pentecost require the absence of a church before Acts 2? Did the Old Testament saints lack saving union with Christ? Must Israel’s national form and the multinational church become two covenant peoples with separate destinies?

Scripture answers with one olive tree and one saving root. The New Covenant church does not earn Israel’s promises or seize them from ethnic Jews. Every promise reaches its goal in Christ, and all who belong to Christ share his inheritance. Unbelieving Jews are broken off, believing Gentiles are grafted in by faith, and natural branches may be grafted in again (Romans 11:20-23).

This position does not deny a future large-scale conversion of ethnic Jews. Romans 11 may give strong reason to expect it, although Reformed interpreters disagree about the precise meaning of “all Israel” in Romans 11:26.5

Whatever future mercy God grants, however, will come through faith in Jesus Christ and entrance into his one redeemed people. There is no covenant salvation alongside the Messiah. For the larger eschatological framework, see Reformed and Amillennial: Five Reasons to Embrace Amillennialism.


Why This Matters

This question reaches beyond a chart of redemptive history. If Abraham was justified by faith and David knew the blessing of forgiven sin apart from works, then the gospel did not arrive late (Romans 4:1-8). We receive the same promised Christ whom the saints of old trusted from afar.

It also changes how we read the Old Testament. Abraham, Moses, and David are not distant figures from somebody else’s religion; they belong to our family history. Israel’s worship, sacrifices, kingship, exile, and restoration show us Christ through promise and type. The Old Testament is Christian Scripture because Christ fulfills it.

Pentecost did not rescue a failed plan or replace one people with another. The risen Christ poured out his Spirit on the church promised in Eden, gathered through Abraham, and formed under Moses, then sent that church into the nations. The administration changed; the Savior and his people remained one.

Christ has kept his church through flood, slavery, wilderness, exile, persecution, and death. He will keep it until faith gives way to sight. The church is older than Acts 2 because the grace of Christ is older than Acts 2. That is good news for every age.

✠ ✠ ✠

Footnotes

  1. Michael J. Vlach, “What Is Dispensationalism,” TheologicalStudies.org, 3; Charles C. Ryrie, Dispensationalism (Moody Press, 1995). ↩︎
  2. Louis Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Eerdmans, 1941), 570, under “The Church in the Different Dispensations.” ↩︎
  3. Moisés Silva, ed., New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology and Exegesis, 2nd ed., s.v. “ἐκκλησία” (Zondervan, 2014). ↩︎
  4. Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 3, Sin and Salvation in Christ, ed. John Bolt, trans. John Vriend (Baker Academic, 2006), 207-208. ↩︎
  5. Compare John Calvin, Commentary on Romans, on Romans 11:26, with John Murray, The Epistle to the Romans, vol. 2 (Eerdmans, 1965), 96-101. ↩︎

FURTHER STUDY

If the continuity of Christ’s church has clarified the question of Pentecost, continue with The True Israel of God: What Scripture Teaches About God’s Covenant People. It traces how the covenant promises reach their goal in Christ and his one redeemed people.

Read the Article →

Deepen Your Study

Join our community to receive Reformed reflections and resources delivered to your inbox.

Scroll to Top